Frame the discussion around achieving common objectives rather than winning the argument. Statements like “We both want to improve customer satisfaction, though we see different paths to get there” establish that you’re on the same team despite differing viewpoints. This approach reduces defensiveness and keeps the conversation solution-oriented.
Before presenting your own viewpoint, demonstrate that you’ve genuinely understood theirs: “I understand your point about prioritizing innovation over consistency in this case. That makes sense because…” This validation doesn’t require agreement but shows respect for their reasoning process.
Ground the discussion in facts, research, or measurable outcomes rather than opinion or authority: “Looking at these specific metrics…” or “Based on the customer feedback data…” Independent thinkers often respond well to evidence-based approaches that focus on the merits of each position.
These techniques work because they address The Maverick’s core values of intellectual engagement and independent thinking. By focusing on shared goals, validating their perspective, and using objective criteria, you create an environment where disagreement feels like collaborative problem-solving rather than a battle for control. This approach allows both parties to maintain autonomy while working toward better solutions.
Remember Boundaries
While productive disagreement is valuable, recognize when a decision point has been reached. Clear processes for moving forward after discussion helps prevent endless debate.
See also: Understanding The Maverick Type and Tip: Leveraging Independent Strengths
